Overview

Original Research

TRIAL IN ABSENTIA AND EXPLICIT CHARGES AGAINST CORRUPTORS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC LAW

ANDRY SYAFRIJAL TANJUNG 1, ASMUNI 2, and HASAN MATSUM 3.

Vol 17, No 10 ( 2022 )   |  DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7262887   |   Author Affiliation: Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia 1,2,3.   |   Licensing: CC 4.0   |   Pg no: 1716-1723   |   To cite: ANDRY SYAFRIJAL TANJUNG, et al., (2022). TRIAL IN ABSENTIA AND EXPLICIT CHARGES AGAINST CORRUPTORS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC LAW. 17(10), 1716–1723. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7262887   |   Published on: 29-10-2022

Abstract

If you look at it from the aspect of the benefit of the Indonesian people as direct victims of corruption. Then the trial process must continue even though the defendant is absent or without the presence of the defendant / in absentia, so that the state money from corruption as evidence can return to the state through appropriate legal process. In the country's financial return the explicit cost consisting of the cost of anticipating corruption, the cost of consequences and reactions to corruption must be considered, so that the country's financial recovery can be carried out.

Keywords

---