IMPLICATIONS OF SUPREME COURT RULES (PERMA) OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 2 OF 2019 TOWARDS LAW CLAIMS BY GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND OFFICIALS
This research is to find the implication of the attendance of Sumpreme Court Rule number 2 of 2019. The goals of this research are to know the enactment of the Supreme Court Rules and what the implication of this rule to Judges, Advocates, Justice seekers and Resolution of Unlawful Act Lawsuits by Government Agencies and Officials. This is the field reseach bby using statute approach, Conceptualical Approach, Case Approach by using Primary legal materials, Secondary materials and Tertiary legal materials. the author found the conclusion of thois research, that The implications of the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2019 on Lawsuits for Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and Officials resulting in uncertainty in enforcing the law by Judges, Advocates as law enforcement officials and justice seekers which results in lengthy time in the process of resolving property rights disputes regarding unlawful acts, and resulted in increased costs incurred in the process of resolving property rights disputes regarding unlawful acts by Government Agencies and Officials, resulting in the failure to achieve the principle of fast, simple and low-cost justice. The nature of unlawful acts by Government Agencies and Officials is that every action taken by Government Agencies and Officials is based on their inherent authority and has resulted in losses for other people, so obliging the Government Agencies and Officials to compensate for the losses that they have caused. And the concept of resolving property rights disputes by justice seekers due to unlawful acts by Government Agencies and Officials.
Implication, Supreme Court Rules, Law Claims